Satisfaction Questionnaires Excerpt

By the end of the school, participants will have to fulfil a questionnaire which includes evaluation of the tuition programme. We provide below excerpts of the questions which will be asked, so that students may anticipate their answers, in particular the rating of lectures and exercises.

This is not yet the questionnaire, only an example of the questions to allow students to prepare ratings

.  What is your overall rating of each of the tracks?
(1 = very poor, 2 = poor, 3 = fair, 4 = good, 5 = excellent)

Track

Rating

Grid Technologies

 

Physics Computing

 

Software Technologies

 

2.  How would you classify the lecture courses
Column a) with regard to content (
Column b) with regard to the quality of presentation?
Column c) with regard to overall rating?
(1 = very poor, 2 = poor, 3 = fair, 4 = good, 5 = excellent)

Lecturers

Track

 (a)

(b)

 (c)

 

 

content

presentation

overall rating

Hélène Cordier

Grid Technologies

 

 

 

François Flückiger

Software Technologies

 

 

 

Rudi Frühwirth

Physics Computing

 

 

 

Robert G. Jacobsen

Software Technologies

 

 

 

Erwin  Laure

Grid Technologies

 

 

 

Martin Liendl

Physics Computing

 

 

 

Alberto Pace

Software Technologies

 

 

 

Klaus Schossmaier

Physics Computing

 

 

 

Heinz  Stockinger

Grid Technologies

 

 

 

3. How do you evaluate the practical sessions  (exercises)?
Column a) with regard to their usefulness?
Column b) as to adequacy and sufficiency of the hardware/software settings?
Column c) what is your overall rating of the exercise series?
(1 = very poor, 2 = poor, 3 = fair, 4 = good, 5 = excellent)
 

Exercise Series

(a)

(b)

(c)

 

usefulness

hardware/
software

Overall rating

Grid
(E. Laure, H. Stockinger)

 

 

 

Tools and Techniques
(R.G. Jacobsen)

 

 

 

Web services
(A. Pace)

 

 

 

Exper. simulation
(M. Liendl)